Pipe.Solar Review 2026: Features, Pricing & Comparison

TL;DR Summary

Pipe.Solar is a residential solar proposal and CRM platform with usage-based pricing starting at $15 per proposal. It excels at sales workflow automation with AI-powered features (Copilot AI) and 15+ financing integrations. However, it lacks electrical engineering tools—no SLD generation, wire sizing, or commercial structures. For residential sales teams wanting streamlined proposals, Pipe.Solar offers compelling simplicity. For commercial EPCs needing electrical documentation, SurgePV offers integrated engineering with automated SLD generation in 5-10 minutes.

Introduction

Solar sales teams deal with a familiar problem: too many disconnected tools. You need one platform for design, another for proposals, a third for financing, and yet another for CRM. Each system forces manual data transfers. Each handoff creates errors. Each delay costs deals.

The result? Sales cycles drag on. Proposals take days instead of hours. Customers shop your competitors while you're still assembling documents. Lost revenue adds up month after month.

Pipe.Solar promises to solve this by combining design, proposals, CRM, and customer portals in one platform. But does it deliver? More importantly, does it have the depth commercial EPCs need—or does it trade engineering capabilities for sales simplicity?

This review examines Pipe.Solar's features, pricing, user feedback, and limitations based on verified documentation from pipe.solar, LinkedIn company data, and platform feature analysis. By the end, you'll know whether Pipe.Solar fits your workflow—or whether alternatives like SurgePV better serve your engineering needs.

What Is Pipe.Solar?

Pipe.Solar is a cloud-based solar proposal and operations platform launched in 2021 by a small team based in Washington, DC. The company positions itself as "Next-gen Solar Proposals + CRM" targeting residential solar installers, dealers, and sales teams.

Company Overview

Founded: 2021

Headquarters: Washington, DC (655 15th St.)

Company Size: 2-10 employees

Type: Privately Held

Industry: Software Development

Source: LinkedIn Company Page (verified January 22, 2026)

Pipe.Solar is a startup-stage company. The small team size means agility but raises questions about support capacity and how fast they can develop features compared to established platforms like Aurora Solar or SurgePV.

Core Capabilities

Pipe.Solar combines four main components:

1. Design Tools: Self-service PV design using Nearmap HD satellite imagery, with claimed 97% accuracy
2. Proposal Generation: Interactive, branded proposals with real-time financing options from 15+ partners
3. CRM & Project Management: Lead-to-install tracking with milestone automation and customer portals
4. AI Automation (Copilot AI): Workflow automation claiming 35% efficiency gains

The platform integrates with major business tools (HubSpot, Salesforce, Zapier, Monday.com) and offers CAD services with 24-hour delivery for projects requiring technical drawings.

Pipe.Solar Features Analysis

Features Overview

Design Tool Deep Dive

What It Does: Pipe.Solar's design tool lets you create PV system layouts using Nearmap HD satellite imagery. You can either design yourself or request a design that arrives in 5-10 minutes.

How It Works: The platform claims 97% accuracy by combining satellite imagery with automated roof detection. Designs show panel placement, system size, and basic shading estimates.

Strengths:

• Fast turnaround for design requests
• Self-service option reduces dependencies
• Nearmap partnership provides high-resolution imagery
• Good for residential rooftop layouts

Limitations:

• Shading analysis appears basic compared to 8760-hour simulations
• No independent validation of 97% accuracy claim
• Limited documentation on design methodology
• Residential focus—unclear commercial project support

User Feedback: Website testimonials mention speed improvements, but no third-party reviews on G2 or Capterra provide independent validation.

SurgePV Difference: SurgePV offers 8760-hour shading analysis with ±3% accuracy compared to PVSyst, providing bankable accuracy for financed projects. SurgePV also supports commercial structures including carports, trackers, and East-West racking—capabilities not found in Pipe.Solar documentation.

Proposal System Deep Dive

What It Does: Creates interactive, branded proposals that homeowners can view on any device. The system integrates pricing, financing options, and e-signature in one workflow.

How It Works: According to Pipe.Solar, the process takes "3 clicks from pricing to financing approval to signing." Real-time pricing updates reflect changes instantly. When prospects open proposals, you get instant notifications.

Strengths:

• 15+ financing partners integrated (Goodleap, Palmetto/LightReach, Sunlight, Sunforce)
• Real-time updates eliminate version control issues
• Mobile-friendly for homeowner convenience
• Custom branding maintains professional image
• Instant open notifications help sales teams follow up quickly

Limitations:

• Focused on residential financing—limited commercial financial modeling
• No mention of P75/P90 bankability metrics for financed projects
• Unclear if proposals include technical depth for commercial clients

SurgePV Difference: SurgePV proposals include P50/P75/P90 estimates for bankable financial modeling, essential for commercial projects with institutional financing. SurgePV also integrates permit-ready electrical documentation directly into proposals—a capability Pipe.Solar lacks.

CRM & Project Management Deep Dive

What It Does: Tracks projects from initial lead through installation, with milestone tracking, task assignment, and document storage.

How It Works: The operations CRM manages the full customer lifecycle. Teams can assign tasks, track milestones, collect site survey photos, and store documents in the cloud. The customer portal gives homeowners real-time project status.

Strengths:

• Customer portal improves homeowner experience
• Cloud document storage centralizes files
• Milestone automation reduces manual tracking
• Scanifly integration adds 3D drone-based design capability
• Good for residential installer workflows

Limitations:

• Limited reporting capabilities based on available documentation
• Inventory management depth unclear
• Focus on sales workflow rather than engineering workflow

SurgePV Difference: SurgePV focuses on engineering workflow efficiency rather than CRM depth. For teams that need both, Pipe.Solar's CRM may be stronger, but SurgePV's electrical engineering capabilities (automated SLD, wire sizing) eliminate the need for separate CAD tools—a bigger time savings for commercial EPCs.

AI Automation (Copilot AI)

What It Does: Automates key workflow milestones using drag-and-drop templates and multi-app connectivity.

How It Works: Copilot AI connects multiple apps and automates repetitive tasks. Pipe.Solar claims this delivers a 35% efficiency improvement.

Strengths:

• Workflow automation reduces manual tasks
• Drag-and-drop interface appears user-friendly
• Multi-app connectivity extends platform capabilities
• Testimonials praise the feature

Limitations:

• 35% efficiency claim not independently verified
• Limited technical documentation on capabilities
• Unclear which tasks are automated vs. manual
• No comparison benchmarks provided

SurgePV Difference: SurgePV's AI focuses on design automation (AI roof modeling, automated SLD generation) rather than workflow automation. For teams prioritizing engineering speed over process automation, SurgePV's approach saves more time on technical deliverables.

Electrical Engineering (Critical Gap)

What It Does: NOT AVAILABLE as an integrated feature.

Pipe.Solar does not include electrical engineering tools. There is no automated Single Line Diagram (SLD) generation, no wire sizing calculators, and no voltage drop analysis—features essential for commercial projects and electrical permits.

What's Missing:

• SLD Generation: Must use external CAD services (24-hour delivery) or AutoCAD
• Wire Sizing: No automated DC/AC wire calculations
• Voltage Drop Analysis: Not found in features documentation
• NEC Compliance Tools: No integrated code compliance checking
• Commercial Structures: No carports, trackers, or ground-mount optimization

Impact for Commercial EPCs: Without electrical engineering tools, commercial EPCs need to maintain separate AutoCAD licenses ($2,000/year) and spend 2-3 hours per project creating electrical documentation manually. This fragments workflows and increases labor costs.

Verification: Confirmed through comprehensive review of pipe.solar features pages, product documentation, and site search—no electrical engineering capabilities found (verified January 22, 2026).

SurgePV Difference: SurgePV generates NEC-compliant SLDs automatically in 5-10 minutes, includes automated wire sizing with voltage drop calculations, and eliminates AutoCAD dependency entirely. This saves 1.5-2.5 hours per commercial project and $2,000/year in software licensing.

Pipe.Solar Pricing & Plans

Pricing Model

Type: Usage-based (per proposal)

Cost: $15 per proposal

Billing: Pay as you go (not monthly subscription)

Source: pipe.solar/pricing (verified January 22, 2026)

What's Included

For $15 per proposal, you get:

• Unlimited users (no per-seat fees)
• Design tool (self-service + request option)
• Proposal generation with financing
• CRM and project management
• Customer portal
• Multi-dealer invitations
• Copilot AI automation

Hidden Costs

CAD Services: Available but requires 24-hour delivery time. Pricing not publicly disclosed—likely additional fees for technical drawings.

Custom Integrations: API available but custom work may incur professional services fees.

Pricing Comparison

Value Analysis at Scale

At 50 Proposals/Month:

• Pipe.Solar: $750/month = $9,000/year
• SurgePV (For 3 Users): $4,497/year total = $1,499/user/year

At 100 Proposals/Month:

• Pipe.Solar: $1,500/month = $18,000/year
• SurgePV (For 3 Users): $4,497/year total = $1,499/user/year

Analysis: Pipe.Solar's usage-based model works well for low-volume operations (under 30 proposals/month). But costs escalate quickly. At 100 proposals monthly, you're spending $18,000 annually—4x more than SurgePV's For 3 Users plan, which includes complete electrical engineering.

Pricing Transparency

Pipe.Solar: High—public pricing clearly stated

Cost Predictability: Variable—depends on proposal volume

Feature Completeness: Good for sales, lacks electrical engineering

Hidden Costs: CAD services (24-hour), custom integrations

SurgePV Value

Transparent Pricing: $1,899/year for 3 users (Individual plan) or $1,499/user/year (For 3 Users plan)

All Features Included: Design, electrical engineering (SLD, wire sizing), proposals—no per-proposal fees

Electrical Engineering Included: Eliminates $2,000/year AutoCAD license

Predictable Costs: Fixed annual pricing enables accurate budgeting

For high-volume commercial EPCs, SurgePV delivers better value with complete engineering capabilities at predictable costs.

What Real Users Say

Review Platform Availability

Pipe.Solar is not listed on major third-party review platforms:

• G2.com: Not Listed (verified January 22, 2026)
• Capterra: Not Listed (verified January 22, 2026)
• TrustRadius: Not Listed (verified January 22, 2026)

This absence makes independent verification of user satisfaction difficult. The company launched in 2021, which may explain limited review presence—but it also means prospective buyers have less external validation.

Website Testimonials

Pipe.Solar features three customer testimonials on their site:

1. Matt D, Director of Ops

"We went from using 3-4 different tools to just using Pipe... Our Sales-to-Install was improved by 12 days!"

Context: Highlights tool consolidation and cycle time improvement. The 12-day improvement suggests significant workflow gains for this customer's specific process.

2. Christian M, CEO

"Our sales reps and dealers love selling through Pipe, it streamlines the entire sales to install process!"

Context: Emphasizes user adoption and workflow streamlining. Positive but lacks specific metrics.

3. Anonymous User

"Copilot AI is a game-changer for our company. The AI automation is magic, highly recommend!"

Context: Praises AI automation feature. Note the use of marketing language that's hard to verify without specifics.

Featured Customers

Pipe.Solar lists several partners:

• Goodleap
• Palmetto/LightReach
• Sunlight
• Sunforce

Important Note: These appear to be financing partners that integrate with Pipe.Solar, not necessarily companies using Pipe.Solar as their primary software platform.

Review Limitations

What This Means for Buyers:

• Cannot validate claims through independent third-party reviews
• Limited sample size (3 testimonials) doesn't represent broad user base
• No negative feedback visible to assess balanced perspective
• Newer product (founded 2021) may improve over time but lacks track record

Recommendation: Request customer references directly from Pipe.Solar. Ask for contacts in similar company size, project volume, and market segment. Trial the platform extensively before committing.

Pros & Cons

Pros (What Pipe.Solar Does Well)

1. Usage-Based Pricing Model

$15/proposal pricing works well for variable volumes or seasonal businesses. You only pay for what you use.

2. Integrated Financing (15+ Partners)

One-click access to Goodleap, Palmetto/LightReach, Sunlight, and others streamlines residential sales.

3. AI Automation (Copilot AI)

Workflow automation claims 35% efficiency improvement—though not independently verified.

4. Fast Design Turnaround

5-10 minute design requests reduce bottlenecks in sales processes.

5. All-in-One Residential Sales Platform

Combines design, proposals, CRM, and customer portal in one interface.

6. Unlimited Users

No per-seat fees mean growing teams don't increase software costs proportionally.

Cons (Limitations to Consider)

1. No Electrical Engineering Tools

No SLD generation, wire sizing, or voltage drop analysis. Commercial EPCs need separate AutoCAD ($2,000/year) plus 2-3 hours manual work per project.

Impact: Fragments workflows and increases costs for commercial teams.

2. Limited Third-Party Reviews

Not listed on G2, Capterra, or TrustRadius—makes independent validation difficult.

Impact: Harder to assess real user satisfaction and identify common issues.

3. Residential Focus

No commercial structures support (carports, trackers, ground-mount optimization).

Impact: Not suitable for commercial EPCs with diverse project types.

4. Variable Costs at Scale

At 100 proposals/month, costs reach $1,500/month ($18,000/year)—4x higher than fixed-price alternatives.

Impact: Cost uncertainty makes budgeting difficult for growing operations.

5. Startup Stage (2-10 Employees)

Small team raises questions about support capacity, feature development velocity, and long-term viability.

Impact: Potential support bottlenecks during growth periods.

6. No Bankability Metrics

No P75/P90 estimates found in documentation—limits use for financed commercial projects.

Impact: Financiers often require conservative projections for loan approval.

SurgePV vs Pipe.Solar Comparison

Head-to-Head Comparison

Where Pipe.Solar Wins

Residential Sales Focus: Pipe.Solar is purpose-built for residential installer sales workflows. If your business lives and dies by proposal velocity and homeowner financing options, Pipe.Solar's focus shows.

Financing Integration: 15+ partners with one-click access beats competitors who require manual setup or limited options.

Usage-Based Pricing: Good for variable volume operations or seasonal businesses. Pay only for proposals you create.

Customer Portal: Branded portal gives homeowners real-time project status—better customer experience than platforms without this feature.

CRM Depth: Better lead-to-install tracking than engineering-focused tools like SurgePV or PVCase.

Where SurgePV Wins

Electrical Engineering: Automated SLD generation in 5-10 minutes vs. Pipe.Solar requiring external CAD services plus 24 hours plus AutoCAD work (2-3 hours manual). This alone saves 1.5-2.5 hours per commercial project.

Commercial Structures: SurgePV is the only platform with native carport design. Also supports trackers and East-West racking. Pipe.Solar has none of these capabilities.

Bankable Accuracy: 8760-hour shading analysis with ±3% accuracy vs PVSyst. P75/P90 estimates for financed projects. Essential for institutional financing.

Cost at Scale: At 100 proposals/month, Pipe.Solar costs $18,000/year. SurgePV For 3 Users plan costs $4,497/year total—saving $13,503 annually while including complete electrical engineering.

Geographic Coverage: India + US + International vs Pipe.Solar's apparent US focus.

Workflow Comparison

Pipe.Solar Workflow (Residential Project):

1. Lead capture in CRM 2 min
2. Self-service design or request 5-10 min
3. Create proposal with financing options 5 min
4. Customer e-sign 2 min
5. CAD request (if needed) 24 hours external delivery
6. Manual SLD in AutoCAD 2-3 hours (if commercial)

Total: ~20 minutes for sales workflow, but 24 hours + 2-3 hours labor if electrical docs needed

SurgePV Workflow (Commercial Project):

1. AI roof modeling 15-20 min
2. System design with commercial structures 15 min
3. Automated SLD generation 5-10 min
4. Automated wire sizing Instant
5. Create proposal with P75/P90 10 min
6. Export permit-ready package 5 min

Total: ~45-60 minutes, all-inclusive with electrical engineering

Real-World Scenario

Scenario: Commercial EPC needs electrical documentation for 200kW rooftop project.

Pipe.Solar Approach:

1. Design system in Pipe.Solar
2. Request CAD services (24-hour wait)
3. Receive CAD files, import to AutoCAD
4. Create SLD manually in AutoCAD (2-3 hours)
5. Calculate wire sizing manually (30-60 min)
6. Return to Pipe.Solar for proposal

Time: 1 day wait + 3-4 hours labor

Additional Cost: AutoCAD license ($2,000/year) + labor

Tools Required: 3 (Pipe.Solar + CAD service + AutoCAD)

SurgePV Approach:

1. Design system in SurgePV
2. Auto-generate SLD (5-10 min)
3. Auto wire sizing (instant)
4. Create proposal with P75/P90 (10 min)
5. Export permit-ready package (5 min)

Time: 45-60 minutes total

Additional Cost: None (all included)

Tools Required: 1 (SurgePV)

Savings with SurgePV:

• Time: 3+ hours per commercial project
• Annual Cost: $2,000/year AutoCAD license eliminated
• Workflow Simplicity: One platform vs three

Who Should Use Pipe.Solar?

Pipe.Solar Is Best For

Small-to-medium residential solar installers (10-100 residential projects/year)

Sales-focused teams needing proposal velocity over engineering depth

Dealers working with multiple financing partners (Goodleap, Palmetto, etc.)

Variable volume operations (seasonal businesses, startups testing market fit)

Teams prioritizing CRM + customer portal features

Pipe.Solar Is NOT Best For

Commercial EPCs needing electrical engineering (SLD, wire sizing required for permits)

Teams requiring automated SLD generation (must use external CAD services)

Projects needing bankable P75/P90 estimates (not found in features)

Companies doing commercial structures (carports, trackers, ground-mount)

High-volume teams (100+ proposals/month where $18K/year cost becomes prohibitive)

International operations (appears US-focused based on financing integrations)

SurgePV Is Best For

Commercial EPCs (100kW-10MW projects)

Teams needing automated electrical documentation (permit-ready SLDs in 5-10 min)

Projects requiring bankable accuracy (±3% vs PVSyst for financed projects)

Companies doing carports, trackers, East-West racking (unique capabilities)

High-volume operations (predictable annual cost vs variable per-proposal)

Multi-market operations (India + US coverage)

Decision Framework

Migration Considerations

Common Reasons to Switch from Pipe.Solar to SurgePV

1. Need Electrical Engineering

Growing into commercial projects that require SLD generation and wire sizing—capabilities Pipe.Solar doesn't offer.

2. Cost at Scale

Per-proposal fees becoming expensive as volume grows. At 100 proposals/month, Pipe.Solar costs $18,000/year vs SurgePV's $4,497/year (For 3 Users).

3. Commercial Expansion

Need to design carports, trackers, or other commercial structures that Pipe.Solar doesn't support.

4. Bankability Requirements

Financed projects requiring P75/P90 conservative estimates for lender approval.

Migration Process (Pipe.Solar to SurgePV)

Timeline: 2-3 weeks

Steps:

1. Data Export: Export contacts, proposals, and project data from Pipe.Solar
2. SurgePV Setup: Configure team accounts, preferences, and templates
3. Team Training: Onboarding sessions on SurgePV features (focus on electrical engineering)
4. Parallel Run: Test SurgePV on new projects while maintaining Pipe.Solar for active deals
5. Full Transition: Move completely to SurgePV once team comfortable

Migration Support (SurgePV)

• Dedicated onboarding specialist assigned to your account
• Data import assistance where applicable (project templates, contacts)
• Team training included in all plans
• 3-minute average support response
• 2-3 week typical onboarding

Risk Mitigation

• Trial SurgePV alongside Pipe.Solar for new projects before full switch
• Start with commercial projects where Pipe.Solar has gaps (electrical docs needed)
• Gradual transition based on project type (commercial to SurgePV, residential stays on Pipe.Solar temporarily)
• Book demo to see SurgePV's electrical engineering features in action

Pipe Solar vs SurgePV: Feature Comparison

How Pipe Solar compares to SurgePV across the features commercial EPCs need most.

Final Verdict

Pipe.Solar Summary

Strengths:

• Usage-based pricing ($15/proposal) good for variable volumes
• 15+ financing partner integrations streamline residential sales
• AI automation (Copilot AI) claims 35% efficiency gains
• All-in-one residential sales platform (design, proposals, CRM, customer portal)
• Unlimited users (no per-seat fees)
• Customer portal improves homeowner experience

Ideal For:

• Small-to-medium residential installers (10-100 residential projects/year)
• Sales-focused teams prioritizing proposal velocity
• Variable volume or seasonal operations
• Dealers working with multiple financing partners

Limitations:

• No electrical engineering (no SLD generation, wire sizing, voltage drop calculations)
• No commercial structures (no carports, trackers, ground-mount optimization)
• Limited third-party reviews (not on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius)
• Costs scale with volume (100 proposals/month = $18,000/year)
• Startup stage (2-10 employees) raises support capacity questions
• No bankability metrics (no P75/P90 estimates found)

SurgePV Summary

Strengths:

• Automated SLD generation in 5-10 minutes (vs 2-3 hours manual AutoCAD)
• Native carport design—only platform with this capability
• Bankable accuracy (±3% vs PVSyst for shading and production)
• Transparent pricing ($1,499/user/year for For 3 Users plan—predictable annual cost)
• Complete electrical engineering (wire sizing, voltage drop, NEC compliance)
• India + US geographic coverage
• Commercial structures support (trackers, East-West racking)

Ideal For:

• Commercial EPCs (100kW-10MW projects)
• Teams needing electrical documentation for permits
• Projects requiring bankable accuracy for financing
• Companies doing commercial structures (carports, trackers)
• High-volume operations (predictable costs at scale)
• Multi-market operations (India + US)

Why Teams Choose SurgePV:

• Complete electrical engineering without AutoCAD (saves $2,000/year + 2-3 hours/project)
• Commercial capability (carports, trackers) unavailable elsewhere
• Predictable costs (no per-proposal fees that escalate with volume)

Our Recommendation

For residential-focused installers prioritizing sales velocity and financing integration, Pipe.Solar offers a streamlined workflow with competitive usage-based pricing for lower volumes (under 30 proposals/month).

However, for most solar EPCs—especially those who:

• Design commercial projects (100kW+)
• Need permit-ready electrical documentation (SLDs, wire sizing)
• Require commercial structures (carports, trackers)
• Want predictable annual costs at scale
• Need bankable accuracy for financed projects

SurgePV delivers a more complete, engineering-grade solution.

Bottom Line

Pipe.Solar is a capable residential sales tool that streamlines proposals and financing. The usage-based pricing model appeals to startups and variable-volume operations. The CRM and customer portal features improve residential installer workflows.

But Pipe.Solar is not built for commercial solar engineering.

When projects require electrical documentation, commercial structures, or bankable accuracy, SurgePV eliminates tool-switching and AutoCAD dependency—saving 1.5-2.5 hours per commercial project while including all electrical engineering for $1,499/user/year (For 3 Users plan).

At 100 proposals monthly, Pipe.Solar costs $18,000/year. SurgePV For 3 Users costs $4,497/year total—saving $13,503 annually while delivering superior engineering capabilities.

For commercial EPCs and high-volume operations, that's not a small difference.

Ready to See the Difference?

Pipe.Solar works well for residential sales. But if you're doing commercial projects, you'll eventually hit a wall: no electrical engineering.

SurgePV solves that problem.

See SurgePV in Action

Book a 15-Minute Demo

What you'll see:

• Automated SLD generation (5-10 minutes vs 2-3 hours manual)
• Native carport solar design (only platform with this capability)
• Bankable accuracy (±3% vs PVSyst for financed projects)
• Transparent pricing (no per-proposal fees that escalate with volume)
• Complete electrical engineering (wire sizing, voltage drop, NEC compliance)

No pressure, no obligation

Book Your Demo

Not ready for a demo?

• Compare SurgePV Pricing
• Read Aurora Solar Review
• Read OpenSolar Review
• Explore Best Solar Design Software

Related Reviews:

• Aurora Solar Review
• OpenSolar Review
• PVCase Review
• Solargraf Review