Comparison 2026
A
Aurora Solar
VS
S
Solargraf: Full Comparison (2026)

Aurora Solar vs Solargraf: Full Comparison (2026)

Detailed side-by-side comparison of Aurora Solar and Solargraf. Compare independent cloud design vs Enphase-tied platform, features, pricing, and which fits your solar business.

Keyur Rakholiya

Written by

Keyur Rakholiya

CEO & Co-Founder · SurgePV

Rainer Neumann

Edited by

Rainer Neumann

Content Head · SurgePV

Key Takeaways

  • Aurora Solar is an independent platform; Solargraf is owned by Enphase Energy
  • Solargraf’s best features are tied to Enphase equipment — limiting flexibility
  • Aurora has superior proposals and CRM integration for enterprise sales teams
  • Neither platform includes native electrical engineering — AutoCAD still needed
  • Solargraf pricing is undisclosed; Aurora starts at ≈$1,765/year
  • SurgePV is equipment-agnostic with all features included at $1,499/year

Quick Verdict

Our Verdict

Aurora Solar wins for teams that need vendor-neutral design with polished proposals and CRM integration. Solargraf wins for committed Enphase installers who want tight equipment integration and streamlined permitting. The catch: choosing Solargraf means tying your software stack to one equipment manufacturer. If you want equipment flexibility with full design-to-permit capabilities, SurgePV is the better option.

Company Overview

A

Aurora Solar

Founded

2013

Headquarters

San Francisco, USA

Focus

Cloud solar design & proposals

Best For

US residential & commercial

Pricing Starts

≈$1,765/yr

S

Solargraf

Founded

2015 (acquired by Enphase)

Headquarters

Enphase Energy (Fremont, USA)

Focus

Design, proposals & permitting

Best For

Enphase-committed installers

Pricing Starts

Undisclosed (varies by Enphase tier)

Feature Comparison

Both are cloud-based residential design tools, but their strategic alignment creates different strengths.

FeatureAurora SolarSolargraf
Cloud-Based Design
Satellite Imagery✓ (Google & Nearmap)
Equipment-AgnosticPartial (optimized for Enphase)
Auto Panel Layout
Shade Analysis✓ (LIDAR + solar access)
Interactive Proposals✓ (Best-in-class)
CRM Integration✓ (Salesforce native)Basic
E-Signature✓ (DocuSign)
Permitting WorkflowBasic✓ (Enphase systems)
Single-Line Diagrams (SLD)✗ (Needs AutoCAD)
Automatic Equipment Pricing✓ (Enphase catalog)
Financial ModelingBasic (US-focused)Basic
Battery Storage Design✓ (Enphase batteries)
Commercial ProjectsLimited
Global Market SupportUS-focusedUS & select markets
Manufacturer Lock-InNoneEnphase-optimized

Design Capabilities

Both platforms handle residential solar design, but their underlying strategies shape the user experience differently.

Aurora Solar Design Strengths

Aurora’s design engine is built around LIDAR data and NearMap HD imagery. You get accurate 3D roof models, automatic panel layouts that account for setbacks and obstructions, and a shade analysis engine that uses solar access percentages. The workflow is fast — experienced users can produce a complete residential design in under 10 minutes.

Aurora is vendor-neutral. You pick any panel, inverter, or battery from their equipment database. This matters for installers who work with multiple manufacturers or switch brands based on pricing and availability. The downside: Aurora has no permitting workflow and no electrical engineering tools.

Solargraf Design Strengths

Solargraf’s design tools are competent for residential projects, but the real value is what happens after design. Enphase integration means automatic microinverter selection based on your panel layout, real-time equipment pricing from Enphase’s catalog, and a permitting package workflow tailored to Enphase systems.

For dedicated Enphase installers, this integration saves time. You don’t manually configure microinverter assignments or look up part numbers. The platform knows what equipment you need and what it costs.

The limitation is obvious: if you use string inverters, or if you switch between Enphase and SolarEdge based on project requirements, Solargraf’s advantages disappear. You’re left with a competent but unremarkable design tool that doesn’t match Aurora’s proposal quality.

Proposal & Sales

Aurora Solar Proposals

Aurora’s interactive proposals remain the industry benchmark for residential sales. Homeowners see a 3D model of their roof, toggle between financing options, and sign contracts through DocuSign. Salesforce and HubSpot integration means leads flow directly into the CRM. For high-volume residential operations running inside appointments, Aurora’s sales workflow is hard to beat.

Solargraf Proposals

Solargraf generates proposals with integrated Enphase equipment pricing. The proposals show system specifications, production estimates, and financing options. E-signature is built in. For Enphase-focused teams, the automatic equipment pricing in proposals is a time-saver — no manual price lookups or configuration changes.

The proposals are functional but lack the visual polish and interactive experience that Aurora delivers. For teams competing on presentation quality, Aurora has the edge.

Pricing Comparison

Comparing pricing directly is difficult because Solargraf’s pricing depends on your Enphase relationship.

Cost ItemAurora SolarSolargraf
Annual License≈$1,765/yearUndisclosed (varies)
Premium Tier≈$2,875/yearUndisclosed
AutoCAD for SLDs?Yes (+$1,800/yr)Yes (+$1,800/yr)
Equipment Lock-In CostNoneEnphase dependency
Pricing TransparencyPublished tiersNot public
Electrical Engineering
Hidden Cost of Vendor Lock-In
Solargraf ties your software to Enphase — switching inverter brands means switching software too

Looking for a Better Alternative? Try SurgePV

Equipment-agnostic design with native electrical engineering, proposals, and financial modeling — no manufacturer lock-in.

Start Free Trial

No credit card required · Works with any equipment · All features included

Pros & Cons Side-by-Side

A

Aurora Solar

Pros

Equipment-agnostic — works with any brand
Best-in-class interactive proposals
Native Salesforce and HubSpot CRM
LIDAR and NearMap HD imagery

Cons

No permitting workflow
No electrical engineering tools
Higher cost than some alternatives
US-centric financial modeling
S

Solargraf

Pros

Deep Enphase equipment integration
Automatic equipment selection and pricing
Built-in permitting workflow for Enphase
Potentially lower cost for Enphase partners

Cons

Tied to Enphase ecosystem — vendor lock-in
Less polished proposals than Aurora
No native SLD or electrical engineering
Opaque pricing — hard to evaluate cost

Who Should Choose What?

Your SituationChoose AuroraChoose Solargraf
100% Enphase installer
Multi-brand equipment flexibility
Enterprise sales team with CRM
Want Enphase permitting integration
Best visual proposal quality
Small team, budget-conscious✓ (if Enphase partner)
Need electrical engineering (SLDs)Consider SurgePV
Equipment-agnostic + full platformConsider SurgePV

Best Alternative: SurgePV

If neither Aurora Solar nor Solargraf fully meets your needs, SurgePV offers equipment-agnostic solar design software without manufacturer lock-in. You get the design speed and proposal quality of Aurora, plus the permitting and engineering capabilities that Solargraf lacks — all without tying your business to a single inverter brand.

SurgePV delivers design, simulation, proposals, electrical engineering, and financial modeling in one cloud platform starting at $1,499/year — with all features included on every plan. No Enphase dependency. No AutoCAD required.

Start your free SurgePV trial and design with any equipment you choose.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Solargraf only for Enphase installers?

Solargraf works with any installer, but its deepest value comes from Enphase integration — automatic equipment selection, real-time pricing, and streamlined permitting for Enphase systems. Non-Enphase teams get fewer benefits.

Is Aurora Solar better than Solargraf?

Aurora has better visual proposals and CRM integration. Solargraf offers tighter equipment-to-permitting workflow for Enphase users. Neither includes native electrical engineering — both need AutoCAD for SLDs.

Does Solargraf work with non-Enphase inverters?

Solargraf supports other equipment, but the platform is optimized around Enphase microinverters. The automated permitting, equipment selection, and pricing features work best with Enphase products.

Which is cheaper, Aurora Solar or Solargraf?

Solargraf’s pricing is not publicly disclosed — it varies by Enphase relationship and volume. Aurora starts at ≈$1,765/year. For Enphase partners, Solargraf may be included or heavily discounted.

What’s a better alternative to both Aurora Solar and Solargraf?

SurgePV offers equipment-agnostic design with native electrical engineering, proposals, and financial modeling in one platform. At $1,499/year with all features included, it doesn’t lock you into any equipment manufacturer.

Can Solargraf generate permit packages?

Solargraf includes permitting workflows, particularly for Enphase systems. However, it does not generate full electrical engineering documents like SLDs and three-line diagrams natively.

About the Contributors

Author
Keyur Rakholiya
Keyur Rakholiya

CEO & Co-Founder · SurgePV

Keyur Rakholiya is CEO & Co-Founder of SurgePV and Founder of Heaven Green Energy Limited, where he has delivered over 1 GW of solar projects across commercial, utility, and rooftop sectors in India. With 10+ years in the solar industry, he has managed 800+ project deliveries, evaluated 20+ solar design platforms firsthand, and led engineering teams of 50+ people.

Editor
Rainer Neumann
Rainer Neumann

Content Head · SurgePV

Rainer Neumann is Content Head at SurgePV and a solar PV engineer with 10+ years of experience designing commercial and utility-scale systems across Europe and MENA. He has delivered 500+ installations, tested 15+ solar design software platforms firsthand, and specialises in shading analysis, string sizing, and international electrical code compliance.

Ready to See the Difference?

Start a free trial and experience why solar teams are switching to SurgePV.