Comparison 2026
A
Aurora Solar
VS
S
Scanifly: Full Comparison (2026)

Aurora Solar vs Scanifly: Full Comparison (2026)

Detailed side-by-side comparison of Aurora Solar and Scanifly. Compare satellite-based design vs drone-based 3D survey, features, pricing, and which fits your solar business.

Keyur Rakholiya

Written by

Keyur Rakholiya

CEO & Co-Founder · SurgePV

Rainer Neumann

Edited by

Rainer Neumann

Content Head · SurgePV

Key Takeaways

  • Aurora uses satellite imagery; Scanifly uses drone-captured 3D models
  • Scanifly delivers inch-accurate roof models; Aurora depends on LIDAR data quality
  • Aurora includes proposals, CRM, and e-signature; Scanifly is survey-only
  • Scanifly requires drone hardware and FAA certification (US)
  • Neither tool includes native electrical engineering
  • SurgePV provides a complete cloud-based workflow without drone dependency

Quick Verdict

Our Verdict

Aurora Solar and Scanifly solve different problems. Aurora provides a complete design-to-proposal workflow using satellite data. Scanifly provides precise 3D site models using drone surveys. If measurement accuracy on complex roofs is your top priority, Scanifly wins. If you need a complete sales workflow without site visits, Aurora wins. If you want a complete design platform without drone dependency, SurgePV is the practical middle ground.

Company Overview

A

Aurora Solar

Founded

2013

Headquarters

San Francisco, USA

Focus

Cloud solar design & proposals

Best For

US residential & commercial

Pricing Starts

~$1,765/yr

S

Scanifly

Founded

2018

Headquarters

Portland, USA

Focus

Drone-based 3D solar site survey

Best For

Precision roof surveys & complex sites

Pricing Starts

Per-project or subscription

Feature Comparison

Aurora Solar designs from satellites; Scanifly surveys from drones. The overlap is minimal.

FeatureAurora SolarScanifly
Cloud-Based
Data SourceSatellite imagery + LIDARDrone-captured photography
Measurement AccuracyInches (depends on LIDAR age)Sub-inch accuracy
Requires Site VisitNo (remote design)Yes (drone flight required)
3D Model GenerationLIDAR-basedPhotogrammetric (true 3D)
Panel Layout Design✓ (Full design tools)Basic placement
Shade Analysis✓ (LIDAR + solar access)✓ (From 3D model)
Interactive Proposals✓ (Best-in-class)
CRM Integration✓ (Salesforce native)
E-Signature✓ (DocuSign)
Single-Line Diagrams✗ (Needs AutoCAD)
Financial ModelingBasic (US-focused)
Roof Condition Assessment✓ (From HD images)
Requires HardwareNoDrone + controller ($1,500+)
Requires CertificationNoFAA Part 107 (US)

Design Capabilities

These tools address different stages of the solar project workflow.

Aurora Solar Design Strengths

Aurora’s strength is speed. Enter an address, get a satellite-based 3D model, place panels, generate a proposal — all without leaving the office. LIDAR data provides reasonable roof height measurements in areas with coverage. For high-volume residential teams doing remote selling, this workflow is efficient.

The trade-off is accuracy. Satellite imagery can be months or years old. LIDAR coverage varies by region. New construction, recent roof work, or complex geometries may not show up correctly. Installers sometimes arrive on site to find the roof doesn’t match what Aurora showed.

Scanifly Survey Strengths

Scanifly solves the accuracy problem by putting a drone over every project site. The photogrammetric 3D models capture actual roof conditions with sub-inch accuracy. You see the real roof — every vent, pipe, antenna, and obstacle — not a satellite approximation.

Drone imagery also serves double duty. You can assess roof condition (age, damage, ponding) before committing to a project, reducing truck rolls on unsuitable sites. The HD images can be shared with customers to build confidence.

The trade-off is operational overhead. Every project requires a drone flight, which means scheduling, travel time, weather dependency, and FAA compliance. For high-volume residential teams closing 20+ deals per week, this slows down the sales cycle.

Proposal & Sales

Aurora Solar Proposals

Aurora provides a complete sales workflow — interactive proposals, CRM integration, financing options, and DocuSign e-signature. For residential installers, this is the core value. You can close deals remotely without a site visit.

Scanifly Sales Tools

Scanifly has none. It produces accurate 3D models and measurements, not proposals. Teams using Scanifly need a separate tool for proposals, financing, and contract signing. Some pair Scanifly with Aurora or other design tools, creating a two-tool workflow.

Pricing Comparison

The cost comparison goes beyond software licenses when drones are involved.

Cost ItemAurora SolarScanifly
Software License~$1,765/yearSubscription or per-project
Hardware RequiredNoneDrone + accessories ($1,500-3,000)
Certification RequiredNoneFAA Part 107 ($175 + training)
Per-Project Time15-30 minutes (remote)1-2 hours (travel + flight + processing)
Proposals Included?
Electrical Engineering?
Total Cost Considerations
Scanifly: Software + drone ($1,500-3,000) + pilot cert ($175) + per-project travel time vs Aurora: Software only ($1,765/yr)

Looking for a Better Alternative? Try SurgePV

Cloud-based design with satellite imagery, native electrical engineering, proposals, and financial modeling — no drone required, no site visit needed.

Start Free Trial

No credit card required · No drone needed · Complete design-to-permit workflow

Pros & Cons Side-by-Side

A

Aurora Solar

Pros

No site visit or hardware required
Complete sales workflow with proposals
Fast remote design (15-30 min per project)
CRM and e-signature integration

Cons

Satellite data can be outdated or inaccurate
No native electrical engineering
Cannot assess physical roof condition
LIDAR coverage gaps in some regions
S

Scanifly

Pros

Sub-inch measurement accuracy
True 3D models from real photography
Visual roof condition assessment
Reduces change orders from measurement errors

Cons

Requires drone hardware and pilot certification
No proposals, CRM, or sales workflow
Weather-dependent — can’t fly in rain or high wind
Slower per-project throughput due to site visits

Who Should Choose What?

Your SituationChoose AuroraChoose Scanifly
High-volume remote residential sales
Complex roofs needing precise measurement
Need proposals and sales workflow
Already have drone pilots on staff
Reducing change orders is top priority
Need complete design-to-permit workflowConsider SurgePV
Need electrical engineering (SLDs)Consider SurgePV

Best Alternative: SurgePV

If neither Aurora Solar nor Scanifly fully meets your needs, SurgePV provides a complete cloud-based workflow without drone dependency. This solar design software gives you satellite-based design with AI-powered auto-layout, native electrical engineering for SLDs and permit packages, interactive proposals, and global financial modeling — all in one platform.

SurgePV delivers design, simulation, proposals, electrical engineering, and financial modeling in one cloud platform starting at $1,499/year — with all features included on every plan. No drone, no AutoCAD, no third-party tools required.

Start your free SurgePV trial and design from satellite to permit in one platform.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Scanifly more accurate than Aurora Solar?

For roof measurements, yes. Scanifly uses drone-captured imagery to create inch-accurate 3D models. Aurora relies on satellite imagery and LIDAR, which can have accuracy gaps of several inches depending on data age and quality.

Do I need a drone to use Scanifly?

Yes. Scanifly requires drone-captured imagery as input. You need a drone (DJI recommended), a Part 107 pilot certificate in the US, and the ability to fly each project site. This adds operational overhead compared to Aurora’s satellite-based approach.

Is Scanifly cheaper than Aurora Solar?

Scanifly claims to be 30-70% cheaper than Aurora for total project cost when you factor in design accuracy and reduced change orders. Software pricing varies by plan, but the drone hardware and pilot certification add upfront costs.

Can Scanifly generate proposals?

Scanifly focuses on 3D site modeling and measurement. It does not include interactive proposal generation, CRM integration, or e-signature capabilities. You need Aurora or another tool for the sales workflow.

What’s a better alternative to both Aurora Solar and Scanifly?

SurgePV offers cloud-based design with satellite imagery, native electrical engineering, proposals, and financial modeling in one platform. At $1,499/year, it provides a complete workflow without requiring drone flights or separate tools.

Can I use Scanifly and Aurora Solar together?

Some teams use Scanifly for accurate site surveys and then design in Aurora or another tool. This works but adds cost and complexity — you pay for two tools and manage data transfer between them.

About the Contributors

Author
Keyur Rakholiya
Keyur Rakholiya

CEO & Co-Founder · SurgePV

Keyur Rakholiya is CEO & Co-Founder of SurgePV and Founder of Heaven Green Energy Limited, where he has delivered over 1 GW of solar projects across commercial, utility, and rooftop sectors in India. With 10+ years in the solar industry, he has managed 800+ project deliveries, evaluated 20+ solar design platforms firsthand, and led engineering teams of 50+ people.

Editor
Rainer Neumann
Rainer Neumann

Content Head · SurgePV

Rainer Neumann is Content Head at SurgePV and a solar PV engineer with 10+ years of experience designing commercial and utility-scale systems across Europe and MENA. He has delivered 500+ installations, tested 15+ solar design software platforms firsthand, and specialises in shading analysis, string sizing, and international electrical code compliance.

Ready to See the Difference?

Start a free trial and experience why solar teams are switching to SurgePV.