Comparison 2026
A
Aurora Solar
VS
P
PV*SOL: Full Comparison (2026)

Aurora Solar vs PV*SOL: Full Comparison (2026)

Detailed side-by-side comparison of Aurora Solar and PV*SOL. Compare US cloud platform vs European desktop software, features, pricing, and which fits your solar business.

Keyur Rakholiya

Written by

Keyur Rakholiya

CEO & Co-Founder · SurgePV

Rainer Neumann

Edited by

Rainer Neumann

Content Head · SurgePV

Key Takeaways

  • Aurora Solar is a US-focused cloud platform; PV*SOL is a European desktop simulation tool
  • PV*SOL offers detailed 3D simulation with battery, EV, and heat pump modeling
  • Aurora has far better proposals and sales workflow; PV*SOL is an engineering tool
  • PV*SOL costs ≈$1,410 one-time; Aurora charges ≈$1,765/year recurring
  • PV*SOL is Windows-only; Aurora runs on any browser
  • SurgePV offers a cloud-based alternative that covers both design and simulation globally

Quick Verdict

Our Verdict

Aurora Solar and PV*SOL serve different markets and workflows. Aurora is a cloud sales platform for US residential teams who need fast design-to-proposal pipelines. PV*SOL is a desktop engineering tool for European installers who need detailed 3D simulation with battery, EV, and heat pump integration. If you need both sales-quality proposals and engineering-grade simulation in a single cloud platform, SurgePV is the practical choice.

Company Overview

A

Aurora Solar

Founded

2013

Headquarters

San Francisco, USA

Focus

Cloud solar design & proposals

Best For

US residential & commercial

Pricing Starts

≈$1,765/yr (subscription)

P

PV*SOL

Founded

1998 (Valentin Software)

Headquarters

Berlin, Germany

Focus

Desktop 3D simulation & design

Best For

European residential & small commercial

Pricing Starts

≈$1,410 (one-time)

Feature Comparison

Aurora Solar and PV*SOL represent different philosophies: cloud sales platform vs. desktop engineering tool.

FeatureAurora SolarPV*SOL
Cloud-Based✗ (Desktop, Windows only)
3D System Design✓ (Satellite-based)✓ (Full 3D modeling)
Satellite Imagery✓ (Google & Nearmap)Import only
Shade Analysis✓ (LIDAR + solar access)✓ (3D object shading)
Battery Storage Simulation✓ (Basic)✓ (Detailed)
EV Charging Simulation
Heat Pump Integration
Interactive Proposals✓ (Best-in-class)✗ (Technical reports only)
CRM Integration✓ (Salesforce native)
E-Signature✓ (DocuSign)
Single-Line Diagrams✗ (Needs AutoCAD)Basic circuit diagrams
European Standards (DIN)
Financial ModelingBasic (US-focused)Basic economic analysis
Global Weather DataUS-focused✓ (Meteonorm)
Multi-LanguageEnglish✓ (German, English, + others)

Design Capabilities

These tools tackle design from opposite angles — satellite-based cloud design vs. ground-up 3D desktop modeling.

Aurora Solar Design Strengths

Aurora uses satellite imagery and LIDAR to create quick, accurate residential layouts. You trace the roof outline, and the auto-layout engine places panels around obstructions with proper setbacks. For US residential installers doing 10+ designs per day, this speed is the competitive advantage.

Aurora’s design-to-proposal pipeline is seamless — one workflow from roof to signed contract. But the platform lacks European market support, German DIN standards compliance, and integration with European energy management systems like heat pumps and EV chargers.

PV*SOL Design Strengths

PV*SOL takes a more engineering-focused approach. The 3D modeling environment lets you build detailed roof structures, surrounding buildings, trees, and other shade-producing objects. The simulation engine calculates shading on a minute-by-minute basis throughout the year.

What sets PV*SOL apart is sector coupling. You can model the interaction between solar panels, battery storage, EV charging stations, and heat pumps in a single simulation. This is standard practice for European residential projects where self-consumption optimization across multiple energy vectors is the norm.

The trade-off: PV*SOL has no proposal builder, no CRM, no e-signature, and no sales workflow. It’s a design and simulation tool, not a sales platform. And it runs only on Windows.

Simulation & Reporting

Aurora Solar Simulation

Aurora produces energy yield estimates suitable for residential proposals. The simulation accounts for shading, system losses, and panel orientation. Results are presented in a customer-friendly format within the proposal. For US residential sales, this level of simulation is sufficient.

Aurora does not produce detailed technical reports with loss diagrams, hourly data exports, or P50/P90 analyses. For projects requiring engineering-grade simulation, Aurora falls short.

PV*SOL Simulation

PV*SOL delivers detailed minute-by-minute simulation with comprehensive loss modeling. The software generates technical reports showing self-consumption rates, grid feed-in profiles, battery cycling analysis, and economic projections over 20+ year horizons.

For European markets where self-consumption optimization directly impacts project economics, PV*SOL’s detailed load profile modeling is indispensable. The ability to simulate the interaction between PV, battery, EV charging, and heat pump consumption in a single model is something no US-focused platform offers.

Pricing Comparison

The pricing models are fundamentally different — subscription vs. one-time purchase.

Cost ItemAurora SolarPV*SOL
License ModelAnnual subscriptionOne-time purchase
Entry Cost≈$1,765/year≈$1,410 one-time
Year 1 Cost$1,765$1,410
3-Year Cost$5,295≈$1,810 (with maintenance)
AutoCAD for SLDs?Yes (+$1,800/yr)Not applicable
Proposals Included?
EV/Heat Pump Modeling?
3-Year Total Cost Comparison
Aurora: $5,295 (subscription) vs PV*SOL: ≈$1,810 (one-time + maintenance) — but neither is complete alone

Looking for a Better Alternative? Try SurgePV

Cloud-based design with engineering-grade simulation, proposals, and native electrical engineering — one platform for US and European markets.

Start Free Trial

No credit card required · Cloud-based · Works globally

Pros & Cons Side-by-Side

A

Aurora Solar

Pros

Cloud-based — works on any device
Best interactive proposals in the industry
Fast residential design workflow
Native CRM and e-signature integration

Cons

US-centric — poor European market support
No EV charging or heat pump modeling
Recurring subscription — expensive long-term
No electrical engineering tools
P

PV*SOL

Pros

Detailed 3D simulation with sector coupling
Battery, EV, and heat pump integration
One-time purchase — lower long-term cost
European standards and regulations built in

Cons

No proposals, CRM, or sales workflow
Windows-only desktop application
No satellite imagery or LIDAR data
No cloud collaboration or team features

Who Should Choose What?

Your SituationChoose AuroraChoose PV*SOL
US residential installer
European residential installer
Need battery + EV + heat pump modeling
Sales team needing proposals
Prefer one-time purchase
Need CRM and e-signature
Must work on Mac/browser
Need cloud + simulation + proposalsConsider SurgePV

Best Alternative: SurgePV

If neither Aurora Solar nor PV*SOL fully meets your needs, SurgePV bridges the gap. You get Aurora-style cloud-based design with satellite imagery and interactive proposals, plus detailed simulation capabilities that work globally — not just in the US or Europe. Add native electrical engineering, and you have a single solar design software platform that replaces both tools.

SurgePV delivers design, simulation, proposals, electrical engineering, and financial modeling in one cloud platform starting at $1,499/year — with all features included on every plan. No desktop install required, no Windows dependency, no regional limitations.

Start your free SurgePV trial and design for any market from any device.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is PV*SOL better than Aurora Solar for European projects?

Yes. PV*SOL was built for European markets with support for local regulations, German DIN standards, heat pump and EV integration, and European weather databases. Aurora is US-centric and lacks European regulatory support.

Can PV*SOL do proposals like Aurora Solar?

No. PV*SOL generates technical simulation reports, not customer-facing sales proposals. Aurora’s interactive proposals are far ahead for residential sales. PV*SOL is an engineering tool, not a sales tool.

Is PV*SOL a one-time purchase?

PV*SOL Premium costs approximately $1,410 as a one-time purchase with optional annual maintenance for updates. This is different from Aurora’s recurring subscription model.

Does PV*SOL work on Mac?

No. PV*SOL is Windows-only desktop software. Aurora Solar runs in any browser on any operating system. Mac users need a Windows virtual machine or Boot Camp to run PV*SOL.

What’s a better alternative to both Aurora Solar and PV*SOL?

SurgePV combines Aurora-style cloud design with PV*SOL-level 3D simulation in one platform. You get proposals, electrical engineering, and global financial modeling at $1,499/year — cloud-based, no desktop install needed.

Does PV*SOL support battery and EV charging simulation?

Yes. PV*SOL Premium includes detailed battery storage simulation, EV charging profiles, and heat pump integration. Aurora Solar has basic battery support but no EV or heat pump modeling.

About the Contributors

Author
Keyur Rakholiya
Keyur Rakholiya

CEO & Co-Founder · SurgePV

Keyur Rakholiya is CEO & Co-Founder of SurgePV and Founder of Heaven Green Energy Limited, where he has delivered over 1 GW of solar projects across commercial, utility, and rooftop sectors in India. With 10+ years in the solar industry, he has managed 800+ project deliveries, evaluated 20+ solar design platforms firsthand, and led engineering teams of 50+ people.

Editor
Rainer Neumann
Rainer Neumann

Content Head · SurgePV

Rainer Neumann is Content Head at SurgePV and a solar PV engineer with 10+ years of experience designing commercial and utility-scale systems across Europe and MENA. He has delivered 500+ installations, tested 15+ solar design software platforms firsthand, and specialises in shading analysis, string sizing, and international electrical code compliance.

Ready to See the Difference?

Start a free trial and experience why solar teams are switching to SurgePV.