Switch from Aurora Solar to SurgePV: Migration Guide for Solar EPCs

Aurora Solar holds a deserved reputation as the premium AI-powered solar design platform for US residential installers, with industry-leading LiDAR roof modeling and polished proposals that lift close rates from 30% to 65% in user-reported case studies. The teams switching to SurgePV in 2026 aren’t dismissing Aurora’s capabilities — they’re rejecting the premium price point, the AutoCAD dependency for commercial SLDs, and the US-centric market focus that limits global operations.

This guide walks through why solar EPCs migrate from Aurora Solar to SurgePV, what SurgePV does that Aurora can’t, the side-by-side comparison, and how to phase the migration without disrupting active customer-facing proposals.

Why Aurora Solar Users Are Switching

Aurora Solar earned its market position through best-in-class AI roof modeling and proposal output for US residential installers. For pure US-residential operations with budget for premium tooling, it remains a strong choice. The teams switching cite four reasons:

1. Premium pricing without transparent tiers. Aurora Solar pricing isn’t publicly listed — buyers contact sales for quotes. Industry estimates place it at $220-259/user/month, or $2,640-6,000+/user/year depending on tier and feature access. For a 5-designer EPC, that’s $13,200-30,000+ annually before accounting for the inevitable feature-gate upgrades. The lack of transparent pricing also forces every evaluation through a sales process — adding 2-4 weeks of friction before teams can compare against alternatives.

2. No automated SLD generation — commercial work needs AutoCAD. Aurora Solar handles residential proposals brilliantly but doesn’t generate single-line diagrams natively. For commercial work, designers either purchase AutoCAD ($2,000/year per seat) or have an electrical engineer hand-draw SLDs from the design output. For an EPC running 5+ designers doing commercial work, this adds $10,000+/year in AutoCAD costs alone. SurgePV generates NEC-compliant SLDs natively.

3. US-centric focus limits international operations. Aurora’s market focus is primarily US residential, with limited depth for international grid codes, currencies, languages, and regional incentive structures. For EPCs operating across multiple countries — common in Europe, India, MENA, Latin America, and Southeast Asia — Aurora’s US-centric workflow forces workarounds for every non-US project. SurgePV operates globally with localized irradiance databases, regional grid code awareness, multi-currency proposals, and 9-language localization.

4. No native carport, tracker, or East-West racking. Aurora Solar’s design canvas doesn’t natively support carport/canopy structures, single-axis or dual-axis trackers, or East-West (vertical) racking. For commercial EPCs whose pipeline includes any of these — and increasingly it does, as commercial solar matures — the missing capability is a hard limit. Designers either skip those projects, use a separate tool, or kludge workarounds in Aurora that produce inaccurate output. SurgePV supports all major racking types in one platform.

What SurgePV Does That Aurora Solar Can’t

SurgePV was designed for paid commercial workflows with international scope from the start. The four areas where it directly addresses Aurora’s structural limits:

Transparent pricing, lower per-seat cost

SurgePV publishes pricing tiers transparently so teams can evaluate cost-fit without entering a sales cycle. Custom organizational pricing for larger teams typically lands 30-50% below Aurora’s premium tier on a per-seat basis. For installers who don’t need every feature in Aurora’s top tier, the cost gap is meaningful — particularly when AutoCAD subscriptions are factored in.

Native US SLD generation, no AutoCAD required

The solar designing module produces NEC-compliant US single-line diagrams from the same project data, with proper conductor labeling, string sizing notation, and AHJ-friendly formatting for permit submissions. For a 5-designer commercial EPC currently paying $10,000/year in AutoCAD subscriptions purely for SLD work, switching to SurgePV eliminates that line item entirely.

Full international workflow

SurgePV operates globally with: localized irradiance databases (calibrated to IMD, NASA POWER, and regional weather services), regional grid code awareness (CEA for India, BSI for UK, IEC for EU, SASO for Saudi Arabia, and more), multi-currency proposal generation (USD, EUR, GBP, INR, AED, SAR, BRL, MXN, and more), and content localization in 9 languages. For international EPCs, this isn’t a feature add-on — it’s the foundation the platform was built on.

All major racking types: carport, tracker, East-West, ground-mount

The design canvas natively supports standard rooftop, carport/canopy, single-axis trackers, dual-axis trackers, East-West (vertical) racking, and ground-mount installations. For commercial EPCs whose pipeline includes any of these — increasingly common as commercial solar matures past basic flat-roof racking — the missing capability in Aurora becomes a hard project-acceptance constraint.

Feature Comparison: Aurora Solar vs. SurgePV

Pricing & Total Cost Comparison

For a 5-designer commercial EPC doing US + international work, the all-in Aurora stack typically runs $25,000-45,000+ annually (Aurora + AutoCAD + occasional separate tool for non-residential projects). SurgePV’s single-platform pricing for the same team usage profile generally lands 30-50% lower while eliminating the workflow tax of switching between tools and the international workarounds.

How to Migrate from Aurora Solar to SurgePV

Most EPC teams complete the migration in 3-5 weeks. The plan below assumes a 3-5 designer commercial team running mixed US residential and international/commercial work.

Week 1: Setup + parallel test

• Day 1-2: Provision SurgePV seats. Set company defaults: branding for proposals, default racking systems, common module/inverter selections, regional templates if operating in multiple countries
• Day 3: Take 2-3 currently in-flight Aurora projects and rebuild them in SurgePV. Verify yield estimates, proposal output quality, and (for commercial projects) SLD generation match or exceed Aurora’s output
• Day 4-5: Test the internationalization workflow — switch project locale, currency, and grid code to verify SurgePV handles your non-US projects natively

Week 2: Train the design team

• Day 1: Group walkthrough of SurgePV — design canvas, simulation, financial modeling, SLD generation (commercial), proposal output. Aurora users typically need 2-4 hours of guided onboarding because the residential paradigms transfer directly
• Day 2-5: Each designer takes one new project end-to-end in SurgePV with senior review. Verify proposal close rates remain comparable to Aurora baseline

Weeks 3-4: Parallel run

• All NEW project intake goes into SurgePV
• Active Aurora projects mid-quote complete in Aurora to avoid disrupting customer-facing timelines
• For projects with active Aurora-generated proposals: complete those proposals in Aurora; new proposals go into SurgePV

Week 5: Cut over

• Confirm no active Aurora projects remain
• Cancel Aurora subscription and AutoCAD seats no longer needed
• Cancel any auxiliary tools used for Aurora’s gaps (separate carport/tracker tool, international workaround tools)
• Archive Aurora project data as PDF exports for compliance reference

When NOT to Switch from Aurora Solar

Honest take: Aurora Solar remains the right choice for some workflows. Don’t switch if:

• You’re a pure US residential installer with budget for premium tooling and no commercial or international pipeline. Aurora’s residential proposal quality and close-rate uplift may justify the premium pricing
• You’re deeply integrated into Salesforce or HubSpot via Aurora’s two-way sync and the integration is mission-critical to your sales operations. SurgePV’s CRM integration is customer-managed rather than native
• Your customers specifically request Aurora-generated proposals as part of their evaluation process

For everyone else — international EPCs, commercial-focused operations needing SLDs, EPCs paying for AutoCAD purely for Aurora’s commercial gaps, or anyone wanting transparent pricing without sales-cycle friction — SurgePV’s all-in-one workflow typically delivers better total economics with broader workflow coverage.

Common Migration Concerns

“Will I lose Aurora’s industry-leading proposal close rates?” Aurora’s proposal quality is genuinely strong. SurgePV’s proposal output is comparable in design quality and customer presentation, with the additional advantage of integrated financial modeling so the proposal numbers come from the same dataset as the design. Most teams report comparable close rates with the workflow efficiency gains showing up in time-per-proposal rather than close-rate changes.

“What about Aurora’s Salesforce/HubSpot integration?” SurgePV doesn’t have Aurora’s specific two-way sync. Instead, it uses standard Zapier-style integrations or custom API connections to your CRM. For most teams, the workflow difference is marginal — designs and proposals export to CRM in both cases. For teams whose Salesforce workflow depends on specific Aurora data fields, the migration adds a CRM integration setup step.

“Can I run both during transition?” Yes — there’s no conflict between Aurora and SurgePV running simultaneously. Most teams keep both subscriptions for 30-60 days during the transition, then cancel Aurora once active projects close.

Frequently Asked Questions

The questions above are answered in the FAQ schema on this page. The short version: SurgePV is the upgrade path when Aurora’s premium pricing, US-centric focus, AutoCAD dependency for commercial work, or missing structure types (carport, tracker, East-West) become hard to justify. Equivalent design quality, broader workflow integration, transparent pricing, and full international coverage in one platform.

If you’re evaluating the switch, the fastest way to verify fit is a 20-minute demo using one of your actual project types. We’ll show end-to-end design, SLD generation (for commercial), financial modeling, and proposal output for a project comparable to yours.