Qualitative Shading Analysis

Qualitative Shading Analysis is a high-level, visual evaluation of all shading elements that may impact a solar PV system’s energy production. Rather than relying on numeric shade-loss calculations, it focuses on identifying where shading occurs, when it occurs, and which obstructions pose the greatest performance risk.

In professional solar designing workflows, qualitative shading analysis is typically performed during early site evaluation, remote design, or pre-sales scoping. It allows designers to quickly assess feasibility before moving into detailed shadow analysis or advanced production simulations.

This approach is critical across residential solar, commercial solar, and utility-scale projects because shading directly influences solar layout optimization, stringing & electrical design, system performance, and long-term bankability.

Key Takeaways

  • Qualitative Shading Analysis provides an early, visual assessment of shading risk.
  • Essential for feasibility checks before detailed simulations.
  • Helps optimize layout strategy and shading mitigation.
  • Reduces redesign cycles and engineering overhead.
  • Complements quantitative shading analysis and production modeling.

What It Is

Qualitative shading analysis functions as a visual diagnostic step within the solar design process. Using satellite imagery, site photos, or 3D models, designers assess shading risk without yet assigning numerical loss values.

Key aspects evaluated include:

  • Presence and severity of shading
  • Type of obstructions (trees, parapets, HVAC units, poles, nearby buildings)
  • Daily and seasonal shading movement
  • Identification of safe vs. high-risk module zones
  • Need for layout changes such as repositioning modules, reducing row count, or adjusting mounting orientation

Tools such as Shadow Analysis, sun-path visualization, and obstruction mapping are commonly used. Unlike quantitative shading analysis, this stage emphasizes engineering judgment—helping teams avoid costly redesigns later in the workflow.

How It Works

A typical qualitative shading workflow includes the following steps:

1. Gather Site Imagery

Designers collect roof or land visuals using satellite maps, drone imagery, LiDAR-assisted tools, or on-site photos—often inside solar designing software.

2. Identify Physical Obstructions

Common shading elements include chimneys, vents, parapet walls, HVAC equipment, trees, neighboring structures, and terrain variations that affect mounting structure placement.

3. Evaluate Sun Path Impact

Designers use basic solar geometry and tools like the Sun-Angle Calculator to visualize how shadows shift throughout the day and across seasons.

4. Map Shading Zones

  • No-shade zones – ideal for high-efficiency modules
  • Intermittently shaded zones – risk-managed placement areas
  • Heavily shaded zones – avoided during layout planning

5. Flag Design Implications

Potential outcomes include:

  • Module relocation
  • Increased mismatch losses
  • Use of module-level electronics
  • Adjusted row spacing in ground-mount systems

6. Prepare Layout Adjustments

Designers refine array placement before running quantitative simulations or finalizing layouts using solar layout optimization.

This workflow naturally integrates with stringing & electrical design, auto-design, and early solar proposals.

Types / Variants

1. Roof-Level Qualitative Shading Analysis

Common in residential solar projects. Focuses on vents, dormers, parapets, nearby trees, and rooftop equipment.

2. Ground-Mount / Utility-Scale Qualitative Analysis

Used to evaluate terrain shading, vegetation, inter-row shading, and tracker row interactions in large sites.

3. 3D Model-Based Qualitative Analysis

Performed in a 3D environment to visually inspect obstruction impacts before numerical simulation.

4. Pre-Sales Quick Shade Check

A fast feasibility check used by solar sales professionals to validate sites before engineering engagement.

How It’s Measured

While qualitative by nature, several supporting visual indicators are used:

  • Sun-path diagrams to evaluate azimuth and altitude angles
  • Seasonal shading patterns comparing summer and winter conditions
  • Relative shading severity (low, moderate, high)
  • Obstruction height comparison to estimate shadow reach

Numeric metrics such as solar access percentage or annual shade loss are typically introduced later during quantitative analysis.

Practical Guidance

For Solar Designers

  • Use qualitative shading analysis early within solar designing workflows.
  • Mark shading zones directly in layouts to guide revisions.
  • Validate high-risk areas using Shadow Analysis.
  • Combine with Roof Pitch Calculator and Sun-Angle Calculator to anticipate seasonal effects.

For Installers

  • Confirm shading assumptions during on-site surveys.
  • Identify trimming or mitigation options for customer-owned obstructions.
  • Coordinate findings with solar installers workflows.

For EPCs & Developers

  • Use qualitative shading to quickly assess terrain and row-spacing risks.
  • Identify zones requiring LiDAR or detailed modeling before procurement.

For Sales Teams

Real-World Examples

Residential Example

A rooftop with chimneys and a nearby tree experiences afternoon shading. Qualitative shading analysis flags west-facing modules as moderate risk, prompting layout shifts and optimizer use before final design.

Commercial Example

A flat roof with HVAC units casts winter shadows across the array. Designers map unsafe zones and adjust placement, improving performance ratio and long-term output.

Utility-Scale Example

Uneven terrain creates morning shading from ridgelines. Qualitative analysis identifies affected tracker rows before detailed terrain modeling begins.

Releated Terms

Win your next project in just minutes.

Connect with a specialist for personalized insights and support tailored to your solar business needs.
Book Demo
UX designer